CamPhil's Product Reviews
Sort:

CamPhil
Verified

VERIFIED OWNER
  • JoinedApr 2017
  • Posts 43
  • Reviews 152
  • Kudos11
Overall   (5.0)
› Quality
› Value
PROS
The real thing, as seen in countless reviews on Youtube. All rods are precisely made. Authenticity checked out (and coilmaster give you a draw entry with every check - I got a win on one of mine!
CONS
None
Lovely and easy to wind on - beats the clones handsomely, with no protrusion of the base of any of the coiling rods through the handle which gives an uneven first wrap. I've now got both, so can compare, and this is well worth the small additional cost. There's a reason most of the reveiwers on Youtube use this equipment, as it simply is better made and will probably last much longer. It'll see me out, that's for sure!
Reviewed on

CamPhil
Verified

VERIFIED OWNER
  • JoinedApr 2017
  • Posts 43
  • Reviews 152
  • Kudos11
Overall   (4.5)
› Quality
› Value
PROS
Price. Range of magnification. Comfort. Ease of use.
CONS
Hard to see which lens is which. Depth of field.
A very useful device for all the close-up and fiddly things that are getting harder with age and deteriorating eyesight. It's pretty easy to use, although the markings on the lenses could be more obvious - to read them, you have to be using it! I've already added little black dots on the edge to show which is which. The optical quality is better than I expected at this price. I bought this for building coils and installing them and wicks into atomisers for vaping, but I can see it getting a far wider use than that, and may even get another (I try to keep my vape gear apart from everything else, as I'm particularly careful to keep my hands spotless when handling things I'm planning to inhale).
Reviewed on

CamPhil
Verified

VERIFIED OWNER
  • JoinedApr 2017
  • Posts 43
  • Reviews 152
  • Kudos11
Overall   (4.5)
› Quality
› Value
PROS
Colour range allows mix & match with mods or toppers, or for colour coding which juice you have in what, especially when testing different flavours. Fit well in most of my atomisers. Comfortable fit with good sized bore (for me)
CONS
O rings could be better quality.
I'll probably be getting some more like this, which I think is a good summary of how good I think they are.
Reviewed on

CamPhil
Verified

VERIFIED OWNER
  • JoinedApr 2017
  • Posts 43
  • Reviews 152
  • Kudos11
Overall   (5.0)
› Quality
› Value
PROS
Fits properly Works smoothly Comes with O ring Much better than old style type.
CONS
None
I have several Toptanks, and it was an irritation to me that one was difficult to use as the airflow control was the old type, with clicks between different sized holes instead of the smooth, continuous adjustment of the later type (also used on the Protank 4). This was exactly the right part to convert the old style one to the new, and I can finally use the airflow control even with arthritis. The old style one will be retired to use as a mounting piece for attaching the RBA section to a tab for building. Of course, this would be equally useful to replace a damaged part (although I'm not sure how you'd damage one).
Reviewed on
SXK Hadaly Styled RDA Rebuildable Dripping Atomizer
SXK Hadaly Styled RDA Rebuildable Dripping Atomizer

CamPhil
Verified

VERIFIED OWNER
  • JoinedApr 2017
  • Posts 43
  • Reviews 152
  • Kudos11
Overall   (5.0)
› Quality
› Value
PROS
22mm, so no overhang on dripbox. Bottom feeder (squonk) pin included. Awesome flavour compared to original. Excellent standard of machining throughout. No hint of machine oil left on any components. Standard 510 drip tips fit, so I can use my preferred one. Easy to build on (if I can do it . . .)
CONS
SXK don't offer this in black, and none of the variants available in black come with the squonk pin.
This lovely little bottom feeding RDA has made my dripbox a revelation. From being a tolerable convenience it has become well enough favoured that I am considering upgrading to one of the more advanced models (the basic one is a pseudo-mechanical single button affair, the version 2 and 160 have full temperature and wattage control). Airflow control is smooth and good enough for a slightly restricted direct lung or a true mouth-to-lung vape, although the dripbox cannot sensibly manage MTL without burninng juice, coil, cotton, and probably your mouth! Having said that, the top (which you rotate to control airflow) is also firm enough to pick up the whole mod without falling off, and hasn't leaked at all, so the engineering tolerances must be first rate. I'm fine with the bare stainless steel, but it's a bit of a shame that SXK don't do dripbox-matching colours for those who prefer a more uniform look. It would become a far more popular upgrade for all variants of the dripbox if they were to choose to do so. Kangertech would have been well advised to outsource their dripbox atomiser supply to SXK when something like this makes such a vast improvement over the original dire fitment. I'm absolutely delighted with it though, and have already and will continue to be recommending it to others!
Reviewed on