etcetera wrote:
I was upset by your anger in this thread but then again I wasn't the subject of the taunting (elsewhere) and so I remained impartial in the matter.
Thats cool but it seems we all have a very different idea of what anger is or looks like.
I wasn't angry. I just simply regretted quickly any support I offered, no matter how small it might be.
Thats not anger.
I don't get the term "poodling".
Claiming that someone is a poodle because they support you much to the derision of those that dislike you.
Even links of the results like I provided from my test would have been helpful. That's just my opinion and preference whether or not it is anyone else's. A comfort factor.
I understand and you are entitled to your thoughts on this. Perhaps if I were one to have played these raffles I might have had a strong opinion that way but as I don't I havent really given it much thought.
But after all the drama we had years ago with various Johnny_469 raffles one would think they would work the way you have mentioned. But I tend to doubt that there will ever be another one. Suspect this was the last.
In Short:
One can hold a strong opinion without anger involved.
Edited on 11/28/2021 at 5:13 PM. Reason:
In the mouth of a typical progressive, a “torrent of online hate” is any idea they don’t share…