shopping cart empty
WORLDWIDE FREE SHIPPING

It's 2016, can we get away from 4 year refilling technology plz?
Login to post a new topic and to write a reply.
Thread Tools Rate This Thread


Search within thread:

Login to rate this thread.
#11 (permalink)      2/18/2016 10:14:31 AM US Central   quote/reply + tips
Avatar
calvert421
Member
  • JoinedMay 2015
  • Posts 76
  • Reviews 125
  • Kudos57
JJJSpiderHunter wrote:

i hate bottom screw filling. everytime i have to fill my goblin i want to punch myself in the face.
Never had a top fill however, so ive never experienced the leak and flooding issues others have.




yup, me too. Love the goblin, but now down to my last screw out of 2 tanks... thats 3 lost so far.

That bottom screw has the crazy power of disappearing from this plane of existence before it even hits the floor.

#12 (permalink)      2/18/2016 10:29:55 AM US Central   quote/reply + tips
Avatar
TheRedlines
Member
  • JoinedJul 2014
  • Posts 2229
  • Reviews 57
  • Kudos1856
Funny... I'm just about to drill and tap a Tube RDA for bottom fill. I don't get why they would have just eliminated that option. It sure limits the combinations of tanks and chimneys you can use with the deck.
#13 (permalink)      2/18/2016 11:17:19 AM US Central   quote/reply + tips
Avatar
ChappySinclair
Member
  • JoinedMar 2015
  • Posts 4038
  • Reviews 0
  • Kudos4781
+2 details
i watched the review on this tank a couple of weeks ago. it is a top fill tank with bottom screw option. the bottom o-ring secures the glass.

at 21:00. i don't speak french tho


Edited on 2/18/2016 at 11:18 AM. Reason:
#14 (permalink)      5/12/2016 5:34:18 AM US Central   quote/reply + tips
Avatar
Tommo66
Member
  • JoinedAug 2015
  • Posts 243
  • Reviews 72
  • Kudos86
Now i want one 👍
You can't argue with an idiot.....
#15 (permalink)      7/20/2017 3:26:14 AM US Central   quote/reply + tips
tamernator
Member
  • JoinedJun 2014
  • Posts 52
  • Reviews 0
  • Kudos6
Its 2017 can we get away from 2000 years old wheel technology and get new wheels that are not round ? No, because it works as intended !